Plans for 140 new homes in Blashford face strong opposition. Residents raise concerns about traffic, wildlife, and flooding.
Plans for 140 new homes in Blashford face strong opposition. Residents raise concerns about traffic, wildlife, and flooding.
Blashford Residents Oppose New Homes Plans: Over 300 Objections Filed
Jean King, a resident of over 50 years on Snails Lane, objects to the plan. King says the fields have always been boggy, unrelated to gravel work. She mentions land near her bungalow was used for landfill, where human remains were reportedly found.
King states a past 2018 plan avoided this area and respected the land. She believes greed has led to extending housing onto sacred ground. Dawn Taylor, another resident, called the plans “totally bonkers”.
Taylor, a lifelong Ringwood resident along with five generations of her family, cannot believe this development is possible. Another resident calls the plan unbelievable and stupid, questioning the investment viability. He also mentioned existing dampness issues.
Residents are concerned about wildlife, potential destruction, and people’s mental health. They are also thinking about future generations. Increased traffic due to construction is another worry.
Gillian Carney claims added traffic will be “detrimental,” while Georgina Walston says it will impact peace. Linda Johnston echoes these traffic concerns, highlighting already long queues during her commute home.
The applicant suggests traffic will primarily use Salisbury Road. Assessments claim the development will not significantly impact the A338. However, other people are concerned about the local wildlife. They also worry about the risk of flooding.
Gail Richens, a frequent visitor to Blashford Lakes, fears the development’s huge impact. She believes it could displace endangered species from the area. Francesca Brown describes the land as a “treasure trove” of nature, home to barn owls, bats, and otters.
Ruth Jones finds building on flood land ridiculous, believing concrete won’t prevent flooding. Instead, she argues it will relocate flooding to other areas. More information is on the planning portal under reference number 25/10114.
Jean King, a resident of over 50 years on Snails Lane, objects to the plan. King says the fields have always been boggy, unrelated to gravel work. She mentions land near her bungalow was used for landfill, where human remains were reportedly found.
King states a past 2018 plan avoided this area and respected the land. She believes greed has led to extending housing onto sacred ground. Dawn Taylor, another resident, called the plans “totally bonkers”.
Taylor, a lifelong Ringwood resident along with five generations of her family, cannot believe this development is possible. Another resident calls the plan unbelievable and stupid, questioning the investment viability. He also mentioned existing dampness issues.
Residents are concerned about wildlife, potential destruction, and people’s mental health. They are also thinking about future generations. Increased traffic due to construction is another worry.
Gillian Carney claims added traffic will be “detrimental,” while Georgina Walston says it will impact peace. Linda Johnston echoes these traffic concerns, highlighting already long queues during her commute home.
The applicant suggests traffic will primarily use Salisbury Road. Assessments claim the development will not significantly impact the A338. However, other people are concerned about the local wildlife. They also worry about the risk of flooding.
Gail Richens, a frequent visitor to Blashford Lakes, fears the development’s huge impact. She believes it could displace endangered species from the area. Francesca Brown describes the land as a “treasure trove” of nature, home to barn owls, bats, and otters.
Ruth Jones finds building on flood land ridiculous, believing concrete won’t prevent flooding. Instead, she argues it will relocate flooding to other areas. More information is on the planning portal under reference number 25/10114.