Siblings Dispute New Extension on Shared Newport Property

A man in Newport can keep his home’s extension. His sister, a co-owner, disagreed with the addition. The city council reviewed the case at a meeting. They heard claims that his application was flawed. Despite a family argument, the project was approved.

Emma Brinkworth said the address has flats and a shop. The man wanted permission for the storage extension. He said the work helped his radio control model business. The sister had not objected at first, he explained.

The man said his sister now has a grudge against him. He stated she is overly interested in the building. She had previously ignored issues with the property.

His sister claimed the application had mistakes. She said a new wall now blocks a road access. This path needed to have safe access, she argued. The extension covers a patio, she also noted. Friends and family used to enjoy barbecues there.

The building work impacts her property enjoyment, she claimed. She mentioned a lost view from the downstairs flat. She also stated the extension is an eyesore. She said he never asked her for permission. She began legal action for property rights infringement.

Pat Drewett objected to the application strongly. He said it had serious inaccuracies and misleading info. He claimed it defied prior planning permissions. He described the changes as a fire hazard.

Council members requested clarity on work notices and rules. Stephen Williams said a letter was sent. It told occupants of the planned building work. The council could not confirm they received it. Fire hazard concerns fell under building control, he added.

Brinkworth said work consent was not a planning issue. She said legal avenues must resolve that issue. The committee voted to approve the request. This approval does not end the family’s legal fight.